Tuesday, February 18, 2025

The Sandersons Fail Manhattan

 


My new novel, the Sandersons Fail Manhattan, is due out in a few months. St. Martin's did a great job with the cover, no?

(If you wish to pre-order, you can do it here. And think of your friends, they might need copies too!)

The original title was "All the Lovely People," which frankly I loved. The kernel of inspiration for the book was my annoyance with all the smart and successful people out there who sat in positions of authority (see: NYC private school boards) who did nothing while the institutions they "oversaw" were being radically transformed.

These were—are—the "lovely people."

St. Martin's view was that it was the perfect title but only if you'd already read the book. If you hadn't, the title was not enough to compel you to find out more, something an effective title would do.

The example they touted was a book called "Fleishman Is in Trouble." Not exactly the "War and Peace" of titles, I thought, but their point was that people wanted to know why this guy Fleishman was in trouble.

Did they? Yes. 

"Fleishman" was a best seller and went on to Netflix fame, so point taken, I suppose.

So, I went back to the drawing board and came up with a bunch of ideas, and St. Martin's loved "The Sandersons Fail Manhattan."

Who are these Sandersons, you wonder, and why are they failing? I have to admit, it has grown on me.

By the way, the early buzz seems to be strong. Here's what Chistopher Buckley (Thank You for Smoking) had to say (he read it in two nights):

"Scott Johnston is the sharpest -- and most fun to read -- satirical novelist writing today. Following on his brilliant debut novel Campusland, he now turns his attention to Manhattan's ever-so-upper East Side, in a laugh-out loud mash-up of Bonfire of the Vanities and Mean Girls. This is D.E.I. at its best: Delicious, Entertaining, Intelligent. Did I mention fun? Great fun."

A little braggy, I apologize, but I'm told I must promote my work.

So, for grins, I'll give you another chapter. 

This scene takes place at Mory's, in New Haven, a venerable Yale establishment. The head of the Lenox School for Girls in New York (around which much of the novel is based) has traveled to meet the head of Yale admissions.


"The Number"


Padma rode the Metro North commuter line up to New Haven. Normally, Faith Collins, Lenox Hill’s college counselor, would have made a trip like this, but Padma wanted to handle this one herself.

Wilson Girard’s office, in the middle of campus, was just as Susan had described it. She mentioned in an email before coming that she’d never been to Mory’s, and that she’d “heard good things.” She's also heard that Wilson was more forthcoming outside the office, most particularly with a cocktail in his hand. 

They made the short walk over from Wilson's office, dodging an errant frisbee or two along the way.

“You know, Yalies invented the frisbee,” he said, tossing one back.

“No, I didn’t know.” Or care, she thought.

“Back in the fifties, students loved the pies from Frisbie’s Pie Company in nearby Bridgeport. One day, some of them turned the pie tins upside down and started throwing them around and the Frisbee was born. So the story goes, anyway.”

“Who knew?” said Padma.

“Who indeed? Ah, here we are.”

They arrived at what looked like a small white clapboard house. Inside was a warren of wood-paneled rooms. The tables were all heavily carved with generations of Yalie initials as well as the crests for the many a cappella groups that would come and sing for their suppers (or drinks, at any rate). Padma had seen the famous Whiffenpoofs sing once when they’d made a west coast swing.

When a tabletop was fully carved, it was removed and bolted to the walls as a kind of art. What wall space remained was crammed with pictures of Yale athletes-past, all wearing the distinct letter sweaters, white with a blue Y.  Padma found it odd that such a progressive school cherished such a backward-looking institution like Mory's, but these east coast schools all loved their traditions.

Wilson led them to a booth. After examining the menu, Padma ordered a salad and something called Baker Soup, along with a Hendrick’s and tonic. She tended to be abstemious, but she was hoping Wilson would follow suit. College admissions officers, at least the ones from desirable schools, were notoriously guarded individuals, and she was here to gather information. She suspected his inner chauvinist wouldn’t allow a woman drink alone.

Sure enough, Wilson obliged, ordering a Macallans on the rocks, along with rarebit.

“Rabbit?” Padma queried. “Where are we, King Arthur’s court?”

Rarebit, not rabbit. Courtesy of the Welsh. Quite tasty, really.”

“I’ll take your word for it.”

The bow-tied waiter returned with the drinks in no time.

“Thank you, Duane.”

“Of course, Mr. Girard,” said Duane, turning to see to other tables.

 “Much of the staff has been here for decades,” said Wilson.

Padma made small talk for a few minutes, waiting for the Macallans to cast its pleasant spell over Wilson. They spoke for a while, exchanging war stories. Wilson complained about how the foreign kids, particularly the wealthier Chinese, had started hiring third parties to write their kids’ essays from scratch. “And now we have AI to contend with, ChatGPT and such, on top of everything. The damn things have gotten to the point where they can write a decent essay.”

 Padma knew this was already becoming a problem at secondary schools as well, and software countermeasures were being used. Staying ahead of cheaters was effectively an arms race. 

Wilson ordered another Macallans. Ever so casually, Padma said, “So, how’s this year shaping up?”

“Very well, or very rough, depending on one’s perspective. We’ll set another record, that seems baked in the cake. We can’t even keep up with the foreign applications, and now that we’re a free ride for anyone whose parents make less than 75k, we’re looking at record numbers domestically, too.”

“How are things shaping up for us, Wilson?” 

“Oh. Applications aren’t even in yet, Padma. I don’t know how to answer that.”

“I know, but maybe we can speak in general terms.”

“Ah, so when you say ‘us’…”

“I mean a school like ours.”

“I think we have a good understanding, don’t we? I assume you have spoken to your predecessor?”

“I have.”

“Then you understand our priorities, institutionally?”

Padma did indeed, and she whole-heartedly agreed with those priorities. But if she was going to be an agent of change, she also had to keep her job. It was a fine line.

“I do, but what about…the others?”

“The others?”

“The more…traditional applicants. I do have constituencies I need to please.”

“Ah, I see.” Wilson to a long swig of his Macallans. “I think you can guess. Got any athletes?”

As the Ivies made room for the foreign, the BIPOC, and the first generation applicants (“first-gens”), athletics had become the last redoubt for most rich white kids in the admissions process. Not football or basketball, mind you, but there was still squash, rowing, golf, fencing, and the biggie, lacrosse. Each of these sports needed to fill a team, and most of the BIPOC kids didn’t have access to a squash court or a rowing shell. Thus, in the Greenwich, Connecticuts, and the Brookline, Massachusettses, there was almost an insatiable demand for private coaches and expensive travel teams.

This was somewhat problematic for city schools like Lenox Hill. They didn’t have the endless playing fields of the New England boarding schools like Andover or the suburban schools like Brunswick. Lenox Hill’s outdoor teams were forced to take a bus for thirty minutes each afternoon to the scruffy fields on Randalls Island, which lay in the noisy shadows of the RFK bridge between the Harlem and East Rivers.

“You know that’s a challenge for us, Wilson. A squash player or two, maybe.”

“Hmm. What about specialists? Any musicians? Scientists?”

“Where are you with legacies these days?” asked Padma. The mere asking made her feel dirty.

“We’re on the verge of phasing them out as a preference altogether. A vestige of another era. In fact, you could say we’re already there, with some exceptions, of course.”

“Those exceptions being kids who happen to be preceded by large checks.”

“Hey, the endowment’s only $45 billion, someone’s got to pay the bills.”

“That was humor, I assume.”

“Yes, humor. It wasn’t funny?”

“It was a little funny.”

“Yes, well, you try being funny after reading a hundred applications a day. Where is Duane?”

“Off snaring a rabbit somewhere, I imagine.”

“It’s not rabbit,” said Wilson.

“It was my turn to make a joke.”

“Ha! I can’t stand all this funny.”

“So, it pains me, but I have to ask: what’s the number?”

Wilson knew exactly what she meant. The “number” was a mere rumor to most, but in certain circles, such as the corner booth at Mory’s on a Wednesday afternoon after two Macallans, it was a real thing. The number was what it cost to buy your kid’s way into Yale.

There were caveats, of course. Your kid couldn’t be a dullard. Those days of well-connected legacies gliding in with B- averages were decades in the past. A minuses and high 600s on all SATs were a necessary floor. Anything lower would drag down the class averages too much, which was unacceptable at any price. Despite how much private contempt they held for it, even the most elite colleges were slaves to the U.S. News and World Report’s annual college rankings. SATs were a big factor.

Still, if your kid met those academic thresholds, there remained a number, and it got bigger every year. It took a lot, after all, to move that $45 billion needle.

Wilson gave her an answer. 

“Seriously?” asked Padma.

“Seriously. The money flows from Asia are off the charts. Mid-East, too. Russia was big for a while, but we have to be careful about them these days.”

“Are these people sending their kids here?

“Some, but a lot of them give money just to have their family names associated with us. The Arabs, in particular. They may not have kids in the pile, but they want a program or a professor’s chair named after them. A Saudi sheik wrote a $30 million check just last week.”

“Wow,” said Padma. “What did he get?”

“An endowed chair in Islamic Studies.”

Yale was a brand of incalculable worth, and they knew damn well what they could get for their precious slots. As for the sheik, $30 mil was probably a drop in the bucket, but it bought him instant prestige, perhaps also washing the stain of some of his country’s less savory pastimes.

“We also get about a billion a year from the feds, which is basically the cherry on top. So, you can see we pretty much don’t have to cater to legacies. An added benefit, between you and me, is that we don’t have to care what our alums think about our approach to things and whether the football team is having a winning year. We pretend to care, of course, but we don’t.”

“I see,” said Padma, who wondered what revelations a third glass of Macallans might bring.

“But, of course, some of our alums are exceptionally generous so exceptions are made. You have any parents this year who play at that level?”

“Maybe. I’ve got one private equity daughter coming up. Father’s at Bedrock.”

“Well, I would think he’s practically choking on money.”

“I suppose. The kid would be fourth gen.”

“Well, I told you what good that does. In fact, it’s a borderline negative with most of my colleagues. Does she play any sports?”

“Not well enough for D1.”

Wilson eyed the small amount of whiskey left in his tumbler. “You should know, even with a big number, there isn’t likely to be room for more than one or two from a school like yours. One to two traditional candidates, I mean. If we’re talking non-traditional, well, there’s no real ceiling.”

Padma knew this would make for an unpleasant conversation with William Sanderson, whom she was supposed to meet in a few days. The Sandersons had met with Miss Collins, Lenox’s college counselor, a few weeks before, and William had made it clear he expected Ginny to enroll at Yale. The sheer entitlement of it boiled Palma’s blood, but she kept that to herself.

“Hey, if it helps, there’s another number that will still get the kid’s folder a hard second look. It helps, but it’s far from a guarantee.” 

“And what is that?”

Wilson told her. Padma leaned back and sighed. “It’s good to be king, I suppose.”

“Well, it beats the eighties when I was an undergrad and the place was falling apart.”

“Hard to imagine,” said Padma. “Wilson, I need to get our numbers up. I know you spoke with my predecessor some years ago and I want you to know Lenox responded.

“Yes, I remember. Your efforts have been quite impressive, but you must understand, we’re under a great deal of pressure here.”

“Pressure? You guys are Yale. You get to make the rules. You’re the ones who apply the pressure.”

“It may look that way, Padma, but we all have people we answer to.”

“And who would that be? The students?”

Wilson gave Padma a crooked smile. “Absolutely. We’re terrified of them. And hey, don’t think I like any of this. Part of me misses the days when we took the class president who was also captain of the football team and a National Merit Scholar. Now you’ve either got to be a specialist or goddamn Greta Thunberg. That’s just the way it is.”

Wilson drained the last of his Macallans. “Look, I shouldn’t be telling you this,” he said.

“Tell me what?”

 “I think you already know we’re prioritizing equity, but there’s an institutional view, from our side of the fence, that schools like Lenox just aren’t keeping up with the kind of equity that we’re looking for in an independent school these days.”

“Wilson, we don’t disagree about any of this. Did you know we just accepted our first eco-sexual.”

“That’s intriguing.” Wilson flagged the waiter. “Duane, could I get some rice pudding? Make it two.” 

“I’m fine, really,” said Padma.

“No, no, you really must try some. It’s transcendent.”

Padma relented and Duane came right back with two servings. Wilson started shoveling some in his mouth. 

“So, remind me what those are again?”

“What?”

“Eco-sexuals.”

“It’s a newly revealed gender choice. They have relations with nature.

“You really are making an effort.” 

“We are.”

“I’ll level with you, Padma. Here’s what I’m up against: it’s perception. The public perception, and the perception from here in New Haven, is that schools like Lenox have not kept pace with the times, even if you say that you have. Appearances are everything. If you want better results from us, you need to move that needle. You’re fighting a century-old reputation. For most of that time, that reputation worked for you. Now, not so much. Bottom line, you need to make a statement,” said Wilson.

“What kind of statement?”

“Something bold. Right now, our focus is on the trans. We need to get our numbers above Harvard’s, but I don’t imagine you can be much help there.”

“Wilson, I’ll be sure to take everything you said into consideration.” 

Padma choked down some rice pudding. She was Indian, so she knew what good rice pudding was. This wasn’t it.

“Mm, it’s delicious.”

“I knew you’d like it!”









Tuesday, January 21, 2025

Mea Culpa (What I Got Wrong about Donald Trump



Donald Trump has run for the GOP nomination three times. I opposed him three times. 

Oh, I voted for him in the general, because, c'mon.

But I went as far as writing a piece for the Daily Caller in August of 2022 on why he shouldn't be the GOP nominee in 2024.

How wrong I was.

In the spirit of being intellectually honest, I'm going to revisit that piece and examine why I was wrong.

Here were my points, followed by my self-administered upbraiding:

1. Trump will turn 80 during his term. While he does not currently appear to be in cognitive decline, who knows about a few years from now? And he’s not exactly in great physical shape, either.

I'm reliably told that Trump didn't sleep for 72 hours around election day. He does events non-stop. Yesterday, he handled dozens of media questions while signing executive orders. One of life's great mysteries is where this man gets his energy. 

2. He will be a lame duck on day one. The 22nd Amendment will prohibit his re-election. Realistically, he will have only a year or so to get anything done. Is this seriously the scenario Republicans want? An octogenarian lame duck? 

It is now apparent that being a one-termer is a source of strength. He doesn't have to weigh every decision through the lens of a future election. This is Trump unleashed (as we fully saw yesterday, and it was glorious).

3. Given the circus-like, perpetually chaotic atmosphere that Trump seems almost to promote, what senior people would be willing to serve in his administration? Add to that the fear of almost immediately attracting the attention of our weaponized justice system, and you have a recipe for a cabinet full of third-string draft choices and attention-seekers.

Wow, missed the mark on that one.

4. He has no political discipline and makes too many unforced errors. It’s tough enough for any Republican when the media and the entire Washington establishment are aligned against you. Why give them grist for their mill? I fully appreciate that Trump’s bumptious and combative nature sometimes served him well when doing battle with the press room, but engaging with Rosie O’Donnell? C’mon.

Bit closer to the mark with this one, but Trump 2.0 seems a bit more disciplined. (Emphasis on "a bit.") But the flip side of his verbal incontinence is his combativeness. I don't think it's a stretch to say that there's no other human being who could have endured what Trump endured and gone on to be elected to the presidency.

5. Trump’s lack of discipline extends to his personal life. While most of the attacks on him were blatant fabrications, he’s just not what one would call a paragon of character, either. I and many others were willing to grin and bear these flaws for the sake of outstanding policy, but America deserves a president who brings both policy and character to the job.

It's clear that, unlike Bill Clinton's presidency, Trump's myriad indiscretions were in his past—meaning that he's less vulnerable to blackmail. That doesn't make it all wonderful. But is there a Boy Scout out there who could come through the hellish crucible that Trump, defeat every last enemy, and emerge stronger than ever? If so, let me know where I can vote for him.

6. I fully believe Trump ran the first two times to be of service to his country, particularly the working class. Ego played a large role, but his commitment to country was sincere. This time, I’m not so sure. He seems more motivated to avenge what he believes happened in the last election than anything else. And yes, a lot of bad stuff went down, but that’s not what I want motivating my party’s candidate. Time to look forward, not back.

Yeah, no. I now believe it's important that Trump go after some of these people. They went way, way too far. The lawfare, the media lies...there have to be consequences or it will happen again. Way wide of the mark on this one.

7. We might lose. Yes, Trump brought a lot of new voters to the polls, particularly working class whites. But he also motivates the other side like no one in history. Right now, Democrats are dispirited and functionally leaderless. That changes overnight if Trump is the nominee.

Total whiff.

8. We have other great candidates! Unlike the Democrats, the GOP has a deep bench.

Well, this much is true, and it bodes well for the future. J.D. has emerged on top of that bench, but there are many others. 

But for now, it's time to step back and watch the man that even Politico is calling a "force of history."

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Dalton - the School that Never Learns

 


What is it with the Dalton School? Better yet, what is it with Dalton parents who shell out $64,300 to have their kids be told they're either victims or oppressors, depending on their melanin content?

This blog has a bit of history with Dalton. For you new parents, I'll get to that momentarily. But first...

Do the letters NAIS POCC mean anything to you?

Probably not, but the Naked Dollar is here to help.

It stands for National Association of Independent Schools People of Color Conference.

It is an annual event that that started back in 1986 with 200 attendees - way back, even, before anyone had dreamed up the letters "DEI."

This year, 8,000 people attended. 

The conference is a festival of acronyms: DEI, CRT, SEL, and every other corrupt manifestation of identitarianism that has bubbled up from the academic sludge pits in the Age of Woke. It's a repudiation of equality in the name of equity, of individualism in the name of collectivism, and very much a large, money making industry.

This year, the POCC also featured a healthy dose of anti-semitism because, well, that's fashionable on the left these days.

One keynote speaker, Dr. Suzanne Barakat, accused jews of "ethnic cleansing." One of her areas of focus, her bio states, is "asyee health."

(And here I was, thinking I kept up with the ever-changing landscape of progressive nomenclature! "Asyee" is apparently short for "asylum seeker," which is, here at the Naked Dollar, short for "illegal alien.")

I could go on (and on) about the conference and the NAIS specifically (now a fully captured, woke organization to which private schools pay tens of thousands a year for membership), but I'll leave that for another day. 

Back to Dalton.

In December of 2020, at peak George Floyd/Covid woke, an inside source sent me an eight-page document of BLMish demands that Dalton teachers and admins were making on the school. It was crazy stuff, like mandating that black students be placed in positions of leadership whether or not they won elections, or, my personal fave, that 50% of all donations to the school be re-routed to public schools.

So, I broke the story, and that began a contentious back-and-forth with the school that lasted a couple of months. (If you scroll back to December of 2020 or search for Dalton, you can see the whole series.) The Naked Dollar blew up, getting over a million hits in two months.

Clearly, I'd struck a nerve.

The Wall Street Journal reached out, so I penned a piece for them, outlining the madness.

This culminated in the firing of Head of School Jim Best. His sin? It wasn't the wokeness, it was more like allowing the curtain to be lifted.

So, Dalton had an unpleasant few months, from which they learned...nothing.

Sources who were at the POCC have confirmed that Dalton sent a delegation of forty-eight teachers and administrators to the conference. 

Forty-eight!

Just to crystallize this for you Dalton parents, let's go through the math, shall we?

Conference registration                        $875

Round trip airfare to Denver (est.)         500

4 nights hotel                                       1,000 

4 days' meals (est.)                                 250


Total                                                   $2,625

x 48                                                  $126,000

That's right, Dalton parents. $126,000, give or take, of your money was spent on this grift. 

The best part is, Dalton brags about it! Here's a picture of the 2022 delegation in the Dalton News:

                            
        

They point out that they annually bring the largest group!

(Parenthetical question from the bleachers: I don't see any white faces there. I get that it's a people of color conference, but whatever happened to multiculturalism? How are we ignorant, microagressing white folks supposed to fully understand our complicity in structural racism if we can't workshop it and maybe drink some mules with y'all?)

Anyway, if DEI is your thing, great, it's a free country, and Dalton is a private school. But 126k is full rides for two deserving kids from the Bronx. Isn't that preferable to four days of affinity group pow wows and intersectionality seminars?

(Did I just say pow wow? I guess my invitation for next year will be rescinded.)


P.S. Btw, for those interested, I have written a novel that has its satirical way with the Upper East Side and its woke private schools. It's called The Sandersons Fail Manhattan, and it's now available for pre-order on Amazon.

Here's the link.


 

Monday, August 19, 2024

Solving the Illegal Immigrant Problem

By some estimates, there are 20 million illegal immigrants in the United States, a number that grows every day. This is a staggering problem, and one created mostly by Democrats.

And yes, that gets me as hot as the next guy. They don't even try to justify it anymore, they just do it.

But assigning blame doesn't change the need to solve the problem.

So, what is the solution?

Donald Trump has been promoting the idea of deportation, and recent polls support this idea.

But, has anyone thought this through? How would you do it?

It took a long time for us to get 2 million soldiers to Europe in World War II. That was one-tenth the logistical challenge.

A 747 holds 400 people. It would take 50,000 flights to get the job done. There are only 434 747s in the world. 

Requisition Icon of the Seas? 

Buses? Do I even have to do the math?

Then there are the optics. Rounding up illegals, detaining them, forcing them on flights...there would be thousands of videotaped scenes of despair and anguish, of families being rounded up, and the media would be there every time. Democrats would make hay. People who thought they supported deportation would change their minds.

Deportation doesn't work on a logistical level, and it doesn't work on a political level. 

It. Will. Never. Happen.

So, what to do?

Here is a five step plan.

1. Shut down the border. Build a wall. Lean on Mexico. These things aren't hard. The first step is containing the problem and not allowing it to get any bigger.

2. Establish hundreds of regional immigration centers. Anyone here illegally must show up and register within three months. As a country, we need to know who is here and have a way to keep track of them. Those registering will be given some sort of provisional resident alien status. No, they will not be allowed to vote.

3. Anyone caught not registering will be subject to immediate deportation, as will anyone caught breaking our laws. 

4. Equally important, any business employing non-registered aliens will be subject to heavy fines. This will give businesses the incentive to pressure their employees to fall in line.

5. Establish a path to citizenship. This would include a citizenship test (in English). 

Yes, I know it seems like this rewards illegal behavior, but we're better off if we can make them Americans. Remember, they're not going anywhere. The alternative is to be like France, with a permanent, resentful sub-class of non-French.

It will take time to fully absorb 20 million people, but it can be done—both economically and culturally (ditch multiculturalism and bring back the melting pot).

What Democrats have done to put us in this situation is disgraceful, but that doesn't alter the reality. It is an historic mess, and now it's time to put solutions in place.

Friday, July 26, 2024

The Assault on Beauty

 


Recently, New York declared an annual "Fat Beach Day."

It was a day when "plus size" people were encouraged to hang out at the beach, proud and unafraid.

Apparently, the idea is spreading (although, if my recent forays to the beach are any indication, every day is plus size day).

One of the organizers described it thus: 

"We're going through something culturally that is impacting us every day on an individual level and a systemic level."

That clear it up for you? (Gosh, these people love the word "systemic.")

Elsewhere, Dove USA, whose principle product is the "Beauty Bar," hired this woman to be a brand ambassador:


Hey, body positivity, people!

And then there are those ubiquitous Gatorade ads...



I could go on but I know I don't have to. We are being told by people who matter that we shouldn't be judgmental about beauty.

At this point, let me state this: I am aware of the old saw, "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder."

But is it, really? Are there no objective standards of beauty, things we can agree on? I think there are, or at least have been. Like this, for instance:


Can we agree that Cindy Crawford is beautiful? And before you say anything, I know that standards of beauty change over time. But I submit if Rubens were alive today he'd be reaching for a damn Pepsi.

This rant, though, is not just about the female form. It's far broader than that. There is an assault on beauty today that is both broad-based and, I believe, ideological.

I'll get to that second part. First, let's see how broad-based this is

How about architecture? 


This is the Boston Public Library. The Renaissance Revival structure, built in the late 19th century, was once described as a "Palace for the People."

Beautiful, no?

Now consider the library's more recent addition, glued right on to the back...


F**king ugly, right? Brutalist eyesore. (If you disagree, I don't want to know you.) 

But wait, Scott, it was designed by Philip Johnson, and he's such an important architect. We all study him in architecture school! Don't be such a Philistine!

Suck it. I don't want to go to your boring dinner parties anyway. I'd probably bring you a lousy bottle of wine and use the wrong fork.

So, how about art?

Can we agree that this is beautiful?


Or, a few centuries later, this?


Now what about this?


But, Scott, that's a Motherwell, and he's sooo important!

I don't care. It's ugly, and I question how much talent or practice it took to paint it. Imagine if Motherwell had been asked to paint the Sistine Chapel.

A more recent trend is called "vomit art," which is exactly that. Here's a practitioner, hard at work:


How about something mundane, like a drinking fountain? Once, our cities designed them like this...


Now, you're more likely to see this...


How about something as simple as a lamp post? I give you lamp posts, yesterday and today.



(Courtesy of the Culture Critic on X.)

And music! In a single generation we have gone from the sublime craftsmanship of Sgt. Peppers and the aching timelessness of God Only Knows to rap music, deconstructed to the point having no melody, harmony, or discernible connection to actual music at all.

We are a society that has decoded the human genome, explored Mars, and can make a pizza arrive at your door in ten minutes. We do great things!

So, why have we turned our back on beauty? What the heck is going on?

Well, something is going on, and if you're guessing it's not a good thing, you'd be correct.

It is a part of a larger assault on Western society, traditions, and culture.

If you are a loyal Naked Dollar reader, you know I've written about critical theory, cultural Marxism, and perpetual protest culture. One of the key takeaways is that it's never about the nominal thing (black lives, trans rights, climate, Gaza...).

The people marching in their daily protests know virtually nothing about any of the underlying issues. The animating force is a hatred of God and Country, something bred in them at our schools. It's a desire to tear down our country, because, after all, why should we have it so good?

Much of this stems from the nihilistic teachings of our intellectual class, critical theory in particular. Critical theory informs us that there's no such thing as absolute truth, that truth is just a fairy tale concocted by those with power.

This intellectual virus spread, giving everyone permission to dismiss the vast inheritance of Western Civilization and its tenets like the Enlightenment, those things merely being the social constructs of the Dead White Europeans who had power back whenever.

All laws, traditions, and institutions stemming from those times needed to be torn down.

What's occurring in the aesthetic realm is no different. Standards of beauty are constructs of the old ways, just another means of oppression. How dare you insist that an artist spend years leaning a craft when the downtrodden—the other— don't have the resources?

Why, any application of paint (or vomit) to canvas is equally valid!

Call it Critical Aesthetic Theory, or perhaps just, "Critical Aesthetics."

Who are you to judge what's beautiful? You and your classical art and your Cindy Crawford are just relics of the old order, and you don't get to decide what's beautiful anymore. In fact, we reject the entire idea of beauty! If we accept that some things are beautiful, we are implicitly saying other things aren't.

No! 

My 300-pound body is beautiful, and if you say otherwise, you are a vile member of the oppressor class—and you know what we do to them these days.

Worse still, there is an historical connection between beauty and religion. Beauty, as manifested in art or architecture, was understood to be a way of apprehending the divine. The great cathedrals, for instance, reached purposefully for the heavens.


                                                   Chartres

Art was meant to reassure us that while perfection may not be attainable in this life, it would be in the next.


                                            The Birth of Venus

But of all the institutions worthy of Ivy League contempt, surely none rank higher than the church and formalized religion. If traditional attitudes towards beauty have anything to do with those things, well, you know...ick.

Are purveyors of our aesthetic decline self aware? Do vomit artists or Madison Avenue advertising suits think, consciously, I am trying to tear down Western Civilization?

For the most part, no. Like the students setting up little Hamas tent villages, they are the useful idiots, coasting along where the culture takes them.

But there are people driving that culture, from the professoriate at our most elite universities to the radicals running some of our most prestigious NGOs (see: Ford Foundation). These places are the font of the evil philosophies that are polluting our minds.

Should you, dear reader, support any of these institutions, stop. Just stop. If you're on a board, quit, and tell them why. Or, better, stay and raise your hand to the lunacy.

Now, this grumpy white man is going to turn on the radio and find the classic rock station.