Sunday, March 29, 2026

How Colleges Can Save Themselves

 


As the collegiate calendar winds down soon for the summer, it's worth asking, how many will reopen in the fall?

Forty-eight have closed in the last five years, and it's all but certain that many more, particularly small liberal arts ones, are on a collision course with extinction.

Consider the demographics. The number of high school graduates peaked last year and will decline annually for as far as the eye can see. Insiders call it the "enrollment cliff."

Additionally, fewer high schoolers will choose to go at all. The ROI on $250,000 simply isn't there, particular as AI savages early-career white collar jobs.

Worse, universities have seen a decline in donations while simultaneously tapping endowments at a higher rate. Both Moody's and Standard & Poors have issued negative fiscal outlooks.

In short, universities have a failing business model, one bloated with fatuous majors and legions of useless administrators. Elon Musk fired 80% of the Twitter staff and the platform is more robust than ever. Imagine what could be done with the academy.

None of this is news. The question is, what can colleges do about it? What role can they play to justify a small fortune and four years of a person's life?

Let's start with the obvious, which is what they need to stop doing: charging the GDP of small countries to attend. To do this, they need to radically reduce overhead. Yale has almost the same number of administrators as it does undergraduates. That's insane.

Then they can excise every department that ends in the word "studies." You know, the grievance factory.

But charging less still leaves the question, charging for what? 

If they are to be saved from themselves, there are strengths colleges can play to, and it's no longer conveying information. It's social development.

Today's teens are increasingly isolated, locked into their screens, gaming or scrolling. They date less, party less. Teen girls, in particular, are seeing huge spikes in mental health issues. Loneliness is endemic.

I learned plenty in college. I've also forgotten most of it. What I kept are lifelong friends, and there are few things I value more. The process of making them involved sports, clubs, parties, and conversations over lingering meals in the dining hall. 

Social things.

Colleges must lean into this on multiple fronts. Start with the pedagogy. The traditional model of professors giving lectures is toast. Information is now free and unlimited. You don't have to go to Harvard to get it. 

Learning must be more interactive and collaborative, with viewpoints actively challenged. Class participation is a must. This will increase retention and teach students how to think for themselves, not just relying on AI for all the answers. 

Outside the classroom, colleges should heavily promote clubs, debating societies, religious organizations, and yes, Greek life. (That last one will be hard after decades of administrative hostility.) Anything that promotes personal connection and interaction.

Sports are equally important, and not just at the varsity level. Club and intramural sports play a role. The pickle ball club at UVA has seven hundred members. How many friendships are being forged on those courts?

Those friendships are a support network in college and long after.

Importantly, it must not be college administrators who "engineer" the social environment, because their ideas will be DEI-tinged nonsense. They need to just get out of the way.

The trend towards off-campus housing solutions also needs to be reversed. Campus is the social hub, and students should be there as much as possible, learning to deal with difficult roommates.

School spirit, treated by some liberal arts schools as vaguely embarrassing, should be embraced. I can accurately assess the cultural health of a university by how well-attended their sporting events are. Top administrators should be seen in the stands.

These experiences can produce socially functional, free thinking, emotionally healthy adults, something AI can never do. Colleges need to understand their abiding strength and run with it. 

The alternative is irrelevance and bankruptcy.


5 comments:

  1. Many colleges force students off campus after a year one or year two. At that point it becomes a commuter school.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Suggestion for your next installment: A review of Yale’s recently-released “Report of the Committee on Trust in Higher Education”. Would love to get your insights and conclusions on this report.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Faculty and administration do not conceive of themselves as failing in any way. They're not interested in saving themselves. The market will take out some schools with a weak constituency. Camille Paglia was inveterately loyal to the arts school which hired her and employed her for 36 years. That school is in liquidation.
    ==
    If there is a qualified answer, it is with co-ordinate state and federal legislation. The federal legislation imposes regulation on inter-state commerce in educational services. The state legislation compels modification of state systems of higher education and a new regulatory architecture for private education. Both state and federal legislation should also impose a revised financing system for higher education.
    ==
    In a revised system, > 90% of those enrolled in tertiary schooling would be enrolled in standard-issue institutions (public or private), the remainder in off-center institutions.
    ==

    ReplyDelete
  4. Posit you have a state with an average population (say, Indiana). You sort the state into catchments and in each is a set of standard-issue institutions whose enrollment target was a function of the population of the catchment. You'd have an adult education center to offer instruction in 3Rs and basic life skills; a 2d chance high school which would allow people to complete unfinished secondary certificates (academic or vocational) and acquire new vocational certificates; a preparatory institute which would offer academic courses as well as some business and technology courses which might be taken spot (to fill in gaps in one's background) or as part of formal certificates which are a prerequisite for certain occupational schools and university-based professional schools; and occupational institutes, which would be a federation of schools each of which would offer certificates or degrees of between 27 and 60 credits in the occupational discipline in question. Someone might have one or two tours of tertiary schooling. The modal tour would be a 25 credit course of study in a preparatory institute completed in six months and then a 48 credit course of study in an occupational institute completed in 11 months and change. Internships might be tacked onto that and / or account for some of the credit count.
    ==
    An average state might have a university. Populous states might have several while small states might sign on to the university in a neighboring state or form a consortium for which there would be a single public university in common. In a typical university, about half the student and faculty manpower would be on the academic side and half on the professional side. On the academic side, you have a 'college' where students follow 30, 60, or 90 credit programs in a discrete subject appended to which is an academic research center which may incorporate some course work but consists mostly of students working on dissertations under faculty supervision. The professional side would typically consist of an engineering institute, a medical institute, a law institute, and a general research center. The first three would offer course sets of varying length apposite for that particular profession. The engineering institute would be divvied up into departments (mechanical, electrical, civil, industrial, chemical...)and might include affiliated schools of architecture or urban planning. The medical institute would have a teaching hospital and school of medicine and might or might not have allied schools (e.g. dentistry and pharmacy). The law institute would just have a law school. Each of these might have a research center at which dissertation were being composed (common for engineering, atypical for the others). The general research center would consist of people writing dissertations on occupational subjects other than those named, typically the study of business or public policy. Some universities might have agriculture and / or veterinary institutes, some clinical psychology institutes.
    ==
    Posit that 33% of each cohort eschews tertiary schooling or puts in time at an adult education center, 22% stop with 2d chance high schools. 30% stop with a conjoined set of time in preparatory institutes and occupational institutes, and about 15% putting in time in universities (with only 12% attending the academic portion).
    ==
    Off-center institutions might consist of service academies, arts academies (music, theatre, dance, and perhaps creative writing), diploma programs (at hospitals, clinical laboratories, museums, libraries, and archives), stand-alone professional schools (some with affiliated research centers), and stand-alone colleges.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Posit that private higher education is to be financed with tuition and room-and-board, with formally or constructively mandated ancillary charges debarred. The prospect may obtain the funds for tuition and room and board from family resources, 3d party patrons, the institution itself in the form of discounts financed by dedicated or undedicated income streams, and loans obtained at market rates from banks, credit unions, or finance companies. The 3d party patron might be a private foundation. It could be a government in some circumstances. The schools would have to make formal disclosure statements to prospective students among them the mean discount accorded each cohort, the share of each students payment package arising from 3d party patrons, the share arising from loans, and the mean service rate of recent cohorts. They'd also have to disclose the stock and flow demographics of the student body and the faculty, along with metrics like standardized test scores for demographic segments of each.

    ReplyDelete